John9615
Members
I appreciate the advice, but the 2.0 is 30% less efficient. If I was to get 40 mpg from a 2.0 that would be great, but it also implies I'd get 56mpg from the diesel, which is even better.ChrisG said:I would be surprised if those were the actual mpg's you would get, the Honda diesel isn't the most economical. Realistically I would say there is a 20% difference between the 2, I have owned both cars albeit in facelift spec.
But it is a tempting idea, especially the auto...